Article 91 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Power to request documentation and information. Official text, practical interpretation, key obligations and compliance implications.

Article 91 is the first rung of the Commission's GPAI enforcement ladder: the power to demand the paperwork. The technical documentation of Articles 53 and 55 exists to be producible — this is the provision that calls the bluff.

Official Text Summary

The Commission may request a provider of a general-purpose AI model to supply the documentation drawn up in accordance with Articles 53 and 55, or any additional information necessary to assess the provider's compliance with the Regulation. The Board may also submit a reasoned request asking the Commission to trigger such a request where that is necessary for its tasks. Requests state the legal basis and purpose, specify what information is required and set a time limit; the provider, or its authorised representative, supplies the information. Supplying incorrect, incomplete or misleading information — or none — is independently finable under Article 101, separate from any underlying breach.

Key Obligations

Compliance Timeline

Applies from 2 August 2026; the 2026 Digital Omnibus deferred the substantive high-risk obligations (Annex III to 2 December 2027, Annex I to 2 August 2028) but did not move this provision.

Official AI Act Compliance Deadline Calendar

Updated · Sources: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and the 2026 Digital Omnibus on AI.

Obligation Applies to Original date New date Status Countdown Legal basis
Prohibited Practices (Art. 5) All providers and deployers active AI Act Art. 5
GPAI Rules (Chapter 5) GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 51-56
Commission Enforcement Powers over GPAI GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 88-94, 101
Transparency Obligations (Art. 50) Providers and deployers of chatbots, generative, emotion recognition systems active AI Act Art. 50
New Art. 5 Prohibition (CSAM / non-consensual intimate imagery) Providers and deployers of generative AI systems active AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 5
AI-Generated Content Marking (pre-existing systems) Providers of generative AI systems on the market before 2 Aug 2026 active AI Act Art. 50(2) — transitional
Regulatory Sandboxes National competent authorities deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 57
High-risk AI — Annex III (standalone) Providers of standalone Annex III systems deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(2)
High-risk AI — Annex I (embedded) AI embedded in Annex I regulated products deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(1)

Download JSON · CC BY 4.0

Frequently Asked Questions

Anything within the Article 53 and 55 perimeter — model and training documentation, downstream information packages, copyright policy, systemic-risk assessments, incident logs — plus any additional information genuinely necessary to assess compliance. Fishing beyond that purpose is what Article 94's procedural rights are for.

Treat the Article 53/55 documentation as a living, producible artefact — versioned, current and reviewable at the deadline a request sets, typically short. A provider that scrambles to write documentation after the request arrives has already converted a paperwork exercise into an enforcement problem.

Stay ahead of AI Act changes

Get compliance alerts when deadlines or obligations change.

No spam. One-click unsubscribe.

Take compliance further with the AI Act Academy

Templates, training modules, and live Q&A — everything needed to implement AI Act compliance.