Article 100 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Administrative fines on Union institutions and bodies. Official text, practical interpretation, key obligations and compliance implications.

Article 100 answers a question most compliance programmes never ask: who fines the EU itself? When Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies breach the AI Act, the European Data Protection Supervisor holds the fining pen — on a deliberately smaller scale.

Official Text Summary

The European Data Protection Supervisor may impose administrative fines on Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies falling within the scope of the Regulation, taking into account the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, the number of persons affected, the degree of cooperation, any prior similar findings and the manner in which the infringement became known. The ceilings are deliberately lower than for private operators: up to EUR 1 500 000 for non-compliance with the Article 5 prohibitions, and up to EUR 750 000 for other obligations. The institution concerned has the right to be heard before any decision, proceedings respect confidentiality, the Court of Justice has unlimited jurisdiction to review, and the funds collected accrue to the general budget of the Union.

Key Obligations

Compliance Timeline

Applicable since 2 August 2025, together with the rest of the general-purpose AI framework; the 2026 Digital Omnibus did not alter this date.

Official AI Act Compliance Deadline Calendar

Updated · Sources: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and the 2026 Digital Omnibus on AI.

Obligation Applies to Original date New date Status Countdown Legal basis
Prohibited Practices (Art. 5) All providers and deployers active AI Act Art. 5
GPAI Rules (Chapter 5) GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 51-56
Commission Enforcement Powers over GPAI GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 88-94, 101
Transparency Obligations (Art. 50) Providers and deployers of chatbots, generative, emotion recognition systems active AI Act Art. 50
New Art. 5 Prohibition (CSAM / non-consensual intimate imagery) Providers and deployers of generative AI systems active AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 5
AI-Generated Content Marking (pre-existing systems) Providers of generative AI systems on the market before 2 Aug 2026 active AI Act Art. 50(2) — transitional
Regulatory Sandboxes National competent authorities deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 57
High-risk AI — Annex III (standalone) Providers of standalone Annex III systems deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(2)
High-risk AI — Annex I (embedded) AI embedded in Annex I regulated products deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(1)

Download JSON · CC BY 4.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A fine on an institution is a transfer inside public money — its function is accountability and visibility, not deterrence by pain. €1.5 million against an EU body is a significant censure; the reputational and inter-institutional cost is the real sanction.

The EDPS acts as their market surveillance authority under the Act. A Union body deploying, say, a recruitment screening system carries obligations parallel to a private deployer's — with Article 100 as the sanction of last resort.

Stay ahead of AI Act changes

Get compliance alerts when deadlines or obligations change.

No spam. One-click unsubscribe.

Take compliance further with the AI Act Academy

Templates, training modules, and live Q&A — everything needed to implement AI Act compliance.