Article 88 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Enforcement of the obligations of GPAI providers. Official text, practical interpretation, key obligations and compliance implications.

Article 88 settles who polices general-purpose AI models: the Commission, exclusively, acting through the AI Office. National authorities supervise AI systems; for the models underneath them, enforcement is centralised in Brussels.

Official Text Summary

The Commission has exclusive powers to supervise and enforce Chapter V of the Regulation — the obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models — and entrusts the implementation of those tasks to the AI Office, without prejudice to the Commission's organisational powers and the Member States' competences. National market surveillance authorities keep their full mandate over AI systems, including systems built on GPAI models; where they need action at model level for the performance of their own tasks, they may request the Commission to exercise its powers. The split is deliberate: systems are supervised where they are deployed, models are supervised once for the whole Union.

Key Obligations

Compliance Timeline

Applies from 2 August 2026; the 2026 Digital Omnibus deferred the substantive high-risk obligations (Annex III to 2 December 2027, Annex I to 2 August 2028) but did not move this provision.

Official AI Act Compliance Deadline Calendar

Updated · Sources: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and the 2026 Digital Omnibus on AI.

Obligation Applies to Original date New date Status Countdown Legal basis
Prohibited Practices (Art. 5) All providers and deployers active AI Act Art. 5
GPAI Rules (Chapter 5) GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 51-56
Commission Enforcement Powers over GPAI GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 88-94, 101
Transparency Obligations (Art. 50) Providers and deployers of chatbots, generative, emotion recognition systems active AI Act Art. 50
New Art. 5 Prohibition (CSAM / non-consensual intimate imagery) Providers and deployers of generative AI systems active AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 5
AI-Generated Content Marking (pre-existing systems) Providers of generative AI systems on the market before 2 Aug 2026 active AI Act Art. 50(2) — transitional
Regulatory Sandboxes National competent authorities deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 57
High-risk AI — Annex III (standalone) Providers of standalone Annex III systems deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(2)
High-risk AI — Annex I (embedded) AI embedded in Annex I regulated products deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(1)

Download JSON · CC BY 4.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A frontier model is placed on the market once and consumed everywhere; 27 parallel enforcement tracks would produce contradictory obligations for the same artefact. Centralising in the AI Office gives providers a single counterpart and the market a single interpretation.

Two regulators instead of one: your national market surveillance authority for the AI system you ship, the Commission for the model underneath. If a model-level defect surfaces through your system, expect the national authority to route it upward under Article 88(2).

Stay ahead of AI Act changes

Get compliance alerts when deadlines or obligations change.

No spam. One-click unsubscribe.

Take compliance further with the AI Act Academy

Templates, training modules, and live Q&A — everything needed to implement AI Act compliance.