Article 82 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Compliant AI systems which present a risk. Official text, practical interpretation, key obligations and compliance implications.

Article 82 covers the uncomfortable case the conformity machinery cannot solve: an AI system that complies with the Act and still presents a risk to health, safety or fundamental rights. Compliance is not a liability shield when real-world danger appears.

Official Text Summary

Where, having performed an evaluation under Article 79, a market surveillance authority finds that a high-risk AI system complies with the Regulation and nonetheless presents a risk to the health or safety of persons, to fundamental rights, or to other aspects of public-interest protection, it requires the relevant operator to take all appropriate measures — without undue delay and within a period it may prescribe — to ensure the system no longer presents that risk when placed on the market or put into service. The Member State immediately informs the Commission and the other Member States, with details of the risk, the system's identification and the measures taken. The Commission consults the parties and can steer a Union-level response.

Key Obligations

Compliance Timeline

Applies from 2 August 2026; the 2026 Digital Omnibus deferred the substantive high-risk obligations (Annex III to 2 December 2027, Annex I to 2 August 2028) but did not move this provision.

Official AI Act Compliance Deadline Calendar

Updated · Sources: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and the 2026 Digital Omnibus on AI.

Obligation Applies to Original date New date Status Countdown Legal basis
Prohibited Practices (Art. 5) All providers and deployers active AI Act Art. 5
GPAI Rules (Chapter 5) GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 51-56
Commission Enforcement Powers over GPAI GPAI model providers active AI Act Art. 88-94, 101
Transparency Obligations (Art. 50) Providers and deployers of chatbots, generative, emotion recognition systems active AI Act Art. 50
New Art. 5 Prohibition (CSAM / non-consensual intimate imagery) Providers and deployers of generative AI systems active AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 5
AI-Generated Content Marking (pre-existing systems) Providers of generative AI systems on the market before 2 Aug 2026 active AI Act Art. 50(2) — transitional
Regulatory Sandboxes National competent authorities deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 57
High-risk AI — Annex III (standalone) Providers of standalone Annex III systems deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(2)
High-risk AI — Annex I (embedded) AI embedded in Annex I regulated products deferred AI Omnibus 2026 Art. 6(1)

Download JSON · CC BY 4.0

Frequently Asked Questions

Conformity is checked against the state of the art at assessment time and the intended purpose declared by the provider. Deployment context, scale effects, interaction with other systems or newly discovered failure modes can produce dangers the requirements did not anticipate — Article 82 is the pressure valve for exactly that gap.

It creates an obligation to act, not a finding of fault: the operator must remove the risk even though nothing was formally non-compliant. Civil liability is a separate question governed by national law and the evolving EU liability framework.

Stay ahead of AI Act changes

Get compliance alerts when deadlines or obligations change.

No spam. One-click unsubscribe.

Take compliance further with the AI Act Academy

Templates, training modules, and live Q&A — everything needed to implement AI Act compliance.